How much is a life
worth? Apparently saviors and holy men
are not the only ones to place a high value on human life. Thugs have been doing it for centuries,
though usually not legally. Kidnap
someone’s precious and he’ll pay you whatever he can get his hand on morally or
immorally. The Supreme Court has
basically ruled corporations are people, a notion I wrote off as ridiculous, but
maybe it’s not. The drug
company, Gilead
Sciences Inc., the manufactures of
sofosbuvir, sold as Sovaldi, is charging $1,000.00 per pill in a treatment
price that will cost patients $84,000.00 to save their lives.
In a recent interview with NPR (see link
below), Gregg Alton, a vice president
at Gilead, said, "We didn't really say, 'We want to charge $1,000 a pill….
We're just looking at what we think was a fair price for the value that we're
bringing into the health care system and to the patients."
This makes me think that Christ, though
savior of the world, was clearly a horrid business man. How much could Living Christ Miracles Incorporated
have charged to bring Lazarus back from the dead? How much could Living Christ Miracles Incorporated
have pumped into not only the economy of Jerusalem, but into the economy the
entire middle east, even the Roman Empire?
Just think, Jerusalem could have had the greatest healthcare system of
the ancient world if Christ had only known “how to charge a fair price for the
value” he was “bringing into the health care system and to [His]
patients."
As a society, we know, unlike
Christ, we fall short of perfection—some of us, like Gregg Alton, very short of
perfection. That is why we regulate. That’s
why it is illegal for me to march into a millionaire’s home, kidnap his
daughter and put an $84,000 ransom on her sweet, blond head. Yet, for some reason, as a society we feel, on
the one hand, corporations should have the free-speech rights of an individual,
and yet on the other hand, none of the legal responsibility of an individual.
I know I’m
over-simplifying. I’m doing it on
purpose. Sometimes morality is
simple. Sometimes evil is clear. It is, without question, evil to charge
$1,000 for a pill that costs at the very highest estimates $100 per pill—especially
when that pill means the difference between life and death.
In a world without the
influences of Satan, one would be fundraising to provide $100 pills that could
save someone’s life for free rather than charging 10 times that to line the
pockets of CEO’s and stock holders.
But there is evil in this
world and it is not always only associated with the pornography industry. It’s time Christians, and anyone else with
moral values, regardless of creed, stand together and demand a moral
society. Universal, affordable
healthcare is part of that society. Christ
didn’t heal only those who could afford it and neither should society. Blood ransom is not moral in any circumstance.
This, I know, is simple
thinking. Morality often is.
NPR is a little more
objective than I am, and you can access their blog through the links below.
Postscript: Morality Is Simple,
but Not Easy: Hypocrisy Comes Naturally
I’m not sure why I blog, other than that there is something
deeply satisfying about putting thoughts to page and getting them out there to
an audience, no matter how small, almost immediately. It comes close to the satisfaction one
receives giving a public reading.
But, like a public reading, it has its drawbacks. One is it’s difficult to take back what you
put out there into the universe. Of
course, this is true with all forms of communication, but because traditional
publication is such a long, drawn-out process, with lots of polite rejections
prior to acceptance, not to mention the revision dialogue after acceptance,
there is lots of time to reflect prior to publication.
Anyway, my previous blog post doesn’t sit well with me. I used some faulty logic and cheap propaganda
techniques, but that’s not what bothers me.
Some things need to be said.
Sometimes it’s better to say something rash, out of anger, than say
nothing at all. What bothers me is that
I made a personal attack against someone I absolutely do not know: Gregg Alton,
a vice-president for Gilead Sciences Inc.
As a society, we know,
unlike Christ, we fall short of perfection—some of us, like Gregg Alton, very
short of perfection.
I have no way of knowing how far short of perfection Gregg
Alton falls. For all I know, he’s a
wonderful father, a kind supervisor, and perhaps even very generous with his
donations to the community. And to be
honest, if I was a vice president for a drug company that basically developed a
miracle drug, I too might be tempted with the following thought:
"We didn't really say, 'We want to
charge $1,000 a pill…. We're just looking at what we think was a fair price for
the value that we're bringing into the health care system and to the
patients."
Although that's a natural human reaction to success, it doesn’t justify the price. I stand by my
claim that in effect Gilead
Sciences Inc. is requiring an $84,000 ransom before freeing hostages of Hepatitis C.
That act simply is immoral.
But speaking out against policy and attacking individuals are two very
different things. Though I consider
myself overall to be a good person, I have sank to some pretty deplorable acts
in my past. I am in no position to judge
the content of character of others.
Thus, the need to apologize: My
readership is small, and I doubt Greg Alton will ever read my post on Gilead
Sciences, Inc. but that doesn’t change the fact that my attack was wrong.
I could erase my previous post, but I don’t want to. Though flawed, it makes some good
points. So instead, I will attach this
to it.
Hopefully, I learn to reflect a little before hitting the “publish”
button and don’t have to do this too often.